This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Open status.

### 2823. `std::array` initialization is still not permissive enough

Section: 24.3.7.1 [array.overview] Status: Open Submitter: Robert Haberlach Opened: 2016-11-16 Last modified: 2018-03-19

Priority: 3

View other active issues in [array.overview].

View all other issues in [array.overview].

View all issues with Open status.

Discussion:

LWG 2590's resolution is incomplete:

>     std::array<int, 1> arr{{0}};

should be fine, but isn't guaranteed, since `{0}` has no type. We should rather go for implicit conversion:

> An array is an aggregate (9.4.2 [dcl.init.aggr]) that can be list-initialized with up to `N` elements whose types are convertible to `T` that can be implicitly converted to `T`.

[2016-11-26, Tim Song comments]

This is not possible as written, because due to the brace elision rules for aggregate initialization, `std::array<int, 2> arr{{0}, {1}};` will never work: the `{0}` is taken as initializing the inner array, and the `{1}` causes an error.

[2017-01-27 Telecon]

Priority 2; consensus is that the P/R is not quite right.

[2018-3-14 Wednesday evening issues processing; priority to 3; move to Open]

Jens: There's nothing you can do about the double braces in std::array. That's a core thing.

STL to write paper to resolve this.

Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N4606.

1. Change 24.3.7.1 [array.overview] p2 as indicated:

   > -2- An `array` is an aggregate (9.4.2 [dcl.init.aggr]) that can be list-initialized with up to `N` elements whose types are convertible that can be implicitly converted to `T`.