This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.

### 3463. Incorrect requirements for `transform_inclusive_scan` without initial value

Section: 27.10.11 [transform.inclusive.scan] Status: New Submitter: Agustín K-ballo Bergé Opened: 2020-07-07 Last modified: 2020-09-06

Priority: 3

View all issues with New status.

Discussion:

The requirements for the overloads of `std::transform_inclusive_scan` without an initial value incorrectly assume that the internal accumulator uses the iterator's value type, as it does for `std::inclusive_scan`, rather than the transformed type of the iterator's value type, as it was intended.

According to the standard, the following program is ill-formed as it requires `std::string` to be convertible to `int`:

>     auto vs = {0, 1, 2};
>     std::transform_inclusive_scan(
>        vs.begin(), vs.end(),
>        std::ostream_iterator<std::string>(std::cout, ";"),
>        [](std::string x, std::string y) { return x + y; },
>        [](int x) { return std::to_string(x); });

libstdc++ and Microsoft's STL accept the snippet, producing `0;01;012;` as expected, libc++ strictly conforms to the standard and rejects it.

These constrains were introduced by P0574R1.

[2020-07-17; Priority set to 3 in telecon]

Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N4861.

> [Drafting note: Current implementations that accept the code, do some form of `auto acc = unary_op(*first);`, therefore the following proposed wording uses `decay_t` instead of e.g. `remove_cvref_t`.]

1. Modify 27.10.11 [transform.inclusive.scan] as indicated:

   >     template<class InputIterator, class OutputIterator,
   >              class BinaryOperation, class UnaryOperation>
   >       constexpr OutputIterator
   >         transform_inclusive_scan(InputIterator first, InputIterator last,
   >                                  OutputIterator result,
   >                                  BinaryOperation binary_op, UnaryOperation unary_op);
   >     template<class ExecutionPolicy,
   >              class ForwardIterator1, class ForwardIterator2,
   >              class BinaryOperation, class UnaryOperation>
   >       ForwardIterator2
   >         transform_inclusive_scan(ExecutionPolicy&& exec,
   >                                  ForwardIterator1 first, ForwardIterator1 last,
   >                                  ForwardIterator2 result,
   >                                  BinaryOperation binary_op, UnaryOperation unary_op);
   >     template<class InputIterator, class OutputIterator,
   >              class BinaryOperation, class UnaryOperation, class T>
   >       constexpr OutputIterator
   >         transform_inclusive_scan(InputIterator first, InputIterator last,
   >                                  OutputIterator result,
   >                                  BinaryOperation binary_op, UnaryOperation unary_op,
   >                                  T init);
   >     template<class ExecutionPolicy,
   >              class ForwardIterator1, class ForwardIterator2,
   >              class BinaryOperation, class UnaryOperation, class T>
   >       ForwardIterator2
   >         transform_inclusive_scan(ExecutionPolicy&& exec,
   >                                  ForwardIterator1 first, ForwardIterator1 last,
   >                                  ForwardIterator2 result,
   >                                  BinaryOperation binary_op, UnaryOperation unary_op,
   >                                  T init);

   > > -1- Let `U` be the value type of `decltype(first)``decay_t<decltype(unary_op(*first))>`.

   > > -2- […]