This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.

### 3487. Missing precondition on input and output aliasing of [numeric.ops]

Section: 27.10 [numeric.ops] Status: New Submitter: Matthias Kretz Opened: 2020-10-01 Last modified: 2020-10-02

Priority: 3

View all other issues in [numeric.ops].

View all issues with New status.

Discussion:

The algorithms `partial_sum`, `exclusive_scan`, `inclusive_scan`, `transform_exclusive_scan`, `transform_inclusive_scan`, and `adjacent_difference` with no `ExecutionPolicy` do not have a precondition "`result` is not in the range [`first`, `last`)". But they explicitly allow "`result` may be equal to `first`". This suggests the precondition got lost, because otherwise the permission is redundant.

Suggested fix: Add "`result` is not in the range [`first + 1`, `last`)." to the Preconditions paragraphs of the affected generalized numeric operations.

[2020-10-02; Issue processing telecon: Priority set to P3.]

Proposed resolution: