This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.

### 2841. Use of "Equivalent to" in [strings]

Section: 23 [strings] Status: Resolved Submitter: Jeffrey Yasskin Opened: 2016-12-09 Last modified: 2018-11-25

Priority: 3

View all other issues in [strings].

View all issues with Resolved status.

Discussion:

Reported via editorial issue #165:

The following places should probably use the "Equivalent to" wording introduced in [structure.specifications]/4.

> 1. [string.cons]/18

>    > Effects: Same as `basic_string(il.begin(), il.end(), a)`.

> 2. [string.capacity]/3

>    > Returns: `size()`.

> 3. [string.capacity]/8

>    > Effects: As if by `resize(n, charT())`.

> 4. [string.capacity]/16

>    > Effects: Behaves as if the function calls: `erase(begin(), end());`

> 5. [string.capacity]/17

>    > Returns: `size() == 0`.

> 6. [string.insert]/27

>    > Effects: As if by `insert(p, il.begin(), il.end())`.

>    > Returns: An iterator which refers to the copy of the first inserted character, or `p` if `i1` is empty.

[2017-01-27 Telecon]

Priority 3; Marshall to provide wording.

Resolved by the adoption of P1148 in San Diego.

Proposed resolution: