This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.

### 3693. §[c.math] Can any of `float/double/long double` overloads be fused into template overloads?

Section: 28.7 [c.math] Status: New Submitter: Jiang An Opened: 2022-04-28 Last modified: 2022-05-17

Priority: 2

View all other issues in [c.math].

View all issues with New status.

Discussion:

IIUC LWG 3234 will be resolved by the recently approved paper P1467R9. While considering adding the newly required overloads of math special functions to MSVC STL, I found that it may be more convenient to implement the whole overload set as a single function template.

However, it's unclear for me whether the every "overload for each cv-unqualified floating-point type", or every currently separately shown overloads in the synopsis of `<cmath>`, is required to be a separated function. As discussed in microsoft/STL#1335, if there were only a separated `double` overload (usually comes from the C standard library) and a fused template overload, calling the overload set with `{}` would be accepted, which is definitely ambiguous when there are separated `float/double/long double` overloads.

I think it may be better to allow implementations to arbitrarily fuse the required overloads.

[2022-05-17; Reflector poll]

Set priority to 2 after reflector poll. One vote for NAD.

Proposed resolution: