This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.

### 3223. `lerp` should not add the "sufficient additional overloads"

Section: 26.8.1 [cmath.syn] Status: New Submitter: Billy O'Neal III Opened: 2019-06-20 Last modified: 2019-08-23

Priority: 2

View other active issues in [cmath.syn].

View all other issues in [cmath.syn].

View all issues with New status.

Discussion:

It seems that `lerp` can't give a sensible answer for integer inputs. It's new machinery, not the legacy C stuff extended with extra overloads.

I would prefer to fix this by explicitly annotating the functions that are supposed to get additional overloads because we keep getting this wrong, but we could also exempt `lerp` in 26.8.1 [cmath.syn] p2.

[2019-07 Issue Prioritization]

Priority to 2 after discussion on the reflector.

Proposed resolution: