Submitter: Fred Tydeman (US)
Submission Date: 1999-10-20
Source: WG 14
Reference Document: N/A
Version: 1.2
Date: 2001-01-22 03:49:35
Subject: fprintf %a and
%A conversions recommended practice
Summary
What should fprintf do when it is printing a
floating-point number using %a and
%A conversions and it is exactly representable
in the given precision? That is, what is the result of:
fprintf("%a", 1.0);? The current wording
appears to say that it be converted into either
0x1.0p0+DBL_EPSILON or
0x1.0p0-DBL_EPSILON/FLT_RADIX, instead of the
correct value 0x1.0p0 (this appears to be an
oversight that forgot about exactly representable values).
What should the strtod family of functions do when converting a hexadecimal form of input and the result is exactly representable? That is, what is the result of: strtod("0x1.0p0", (char **)NULL);? The current wording appears to say that it be converted into either 1.0+DBL_EPSILON or 1.0-DBL_EPSILON/FLT_RADIX, instead of the correct value 1.0 (this appears to be an oversight that forgot about exactly representable values).
Technical Corrigendum
7.19.6.1 The fprintf function:
Page 279, Paragraph 12 should be changed from:
If FLT_RADIX is not a power of 2, the result should be one of the two adjacent numbers in hexadecimal floating style with the given precision, with the extra stipulation that the error should have a correct sign for the current rounding direction.to:
For a and A conversions, if FLT_RADIX is not a power of 2 and the result is not exactly representable in the given precision, the result should be one of the two adjacent numbers in hexadecimal floating style with the given precision, with the extra stipulation that the error should have a correct sign for the current rounding direction.
7.20.1.3 The strtod ... functions:
Page 308, paragraph 8 should be changed from:
If the subject sequence has the hexadecimal form and FLT_RADIX is not a power of 2, the result should be one of the two numbers in the appropriate internal format that are adjacent to the hexadecimal floating source value, with the extra stipulation that the error should have a correct sign for the current rounding direction.to:
If the subject sequence has the hexadecimal form, FLT_RADIX is not a power of 2 and the result is not exactly representable, the result should be one of the two numbers in the appropriate internal format that are adjacent to the hexadecimal floating source value, with the extra stipulation that the error should have a correct sign for the current rounding direction.
Page 354, Paragraph 12 should be changed from:
If FLT_RADIX is not a power of 2, the result should be one of the two adjacent numbers in hexadecimal floating style with the given precision, with the extra stipulation that the error should have a correct sign for the current rounding direction.to:
For a and A conversions, if FLT_RADIX is not a power of 2 and the result is not exactly representable in the given precision, the result should be one of the two adjacent numbers in hexadecimal floating style with the given precision, with the extra stipulation that the error should have a correct sign for the current rounding direction.
7.24.4.1.1 The wcstod ... functions:
Page 372, paragraph 8 should be changed from:
If the subject sequence has the hexadecimal form and FLT_RADIX is not a power of 2, the result should be one of the two numbers in the appropriate internal format that are adjacent to the hexadecimal floating source value, with the extra stipulation that the error should have a correct sign for the current rounding direction.to:
If the subject sequence has the hexadecimal form, FLT_RADIX is not a power of 2 and the result is not exactly representable, the result should be one of the two numbers in the appropriate internal format that are adjacent to the hexadecimal floating source value, with the extra stipulation that the error should have a correct sign for the current rounding direction.